This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice.
Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship.
Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances.
AI DISCLAIMER HANDLING (STRICT BUT STABLE)
Katherine lost everything. Not to market volatility, not to a bad investment, but to a misplaced codicil. She’d meticulously updated her estate plan, intending to leave her San Diego beach house to her daughter, Reina. But the signed codicil, the one clearly revoking the previous will, vanished somewhere between her lawyer’s office and the safety deposit box. The probate court, bound by strict rules of evidence, was forced to uphold the original will, which left the property to her estranged ex-husband. The resulting legal fees and emotional distress cost Katherine’s estate over $80,000 – money Reina could have used for college.
As an estate planning attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience here in San Diego, I see these scenarios play out with alarming frequency. Clients think a simple handwritten update or a verbal agreement will suffice, failing to understand the critical importance of proper execution and safekeeping of estate planning documents. It’s not just about having a will or trust; it’s about ensuring it’s legally sound and accessible when needed. My background as a CPA provides a unique advantage – I don’t just plan for the transfer of assets, I understand the tax implications, including crucial step-up in basis rules, capital gains considerations, and proper asset valuation.
What happens if a codicil is lost or misplaced?

A codicil, simply put, is an amendment to an existing will. It must be executed with the same level of formality as the original will: signed, witnessed, and notarized. If a codicil is lost after being properly executed, it creates a legal mess. The court will likely require a copy, and if a credible copy cannot be produced, the codicil may be deemed invalid. This means the original will, even if outdated, will govern the distribution of assets. The burden of proof falls on the party attempting to prove the validity of the lost codicil.
What are the strict requirements for a valid will or trust in California?
California law demands specific formalities. A valid will requires: (1) the testator (the person making the will) being at least 18 years old, (2) being of sound mind, and (3) a written document signed by the testator, or signed on their behalf by another in their presence and under their direction. Crucially, it must also be witnessed by two adults, both of whom must be present when the testator signs, and who then sign the will themselves in the testator’s presence. Trusts, while offering more flexibility, also have specific requirements regarding funding and administration.
How can I protect my estate plan from being challenged?
Proactive measures are essential. First, ensure your documents are drafted by a qualified attorney familiar with California probate and trust law. Second, maintain meticulous records. Keep original signed documents in a secure location, like a fireproof safe or a bank safety deposit box. Inform your executor and a trusted family member of the location. Finally, review and update your estate plan regularly – at least every three to five years, or whenever there’s a significant life event, such as a marriage, divorce, birth of a child, or substantial change in assets.
What is the role of an executor, and what are their potential liabilities?
The executor, named in the will, is responsible for administering the estate. This includes gathering assets, paying debts and taxes, and distributing the remaining assets to beneficiaries. It’s a significant responsibility, and executors can be held personally liable for errors or omissions. Probate Code § 11420 dictates that debts aren’t paid on a first-come, first-served basis; instead, a strict hierarchy governs the distribution of funds: (1) Administration expenses, (2) Funeral costs, (3) Medical/Last Illness, (4) Family Allowance, (5) Wage Claims, and finally (7) General Debts (credit cards). An executor who disregards this hierarchy can face personal liability.
What are the deadlines for handling probate claims, and what happens if they are missed?
Creditors have a strict window to file a claim: either 4 months after Letters are issued or 60 days after notice is mailed (whichever is later). Once this period expires, unfiled claims are generally forever barred, protecting the heirs. This is outlined in Probate Code § 9100. However, there are exceptions, particularly regarding claims against public entities. Probate Code § 9202 states that the executor has a mandatory duty to send specific notice to the Franchise Tax Board, Victim Compensation Board, and Medi-Cal (DHCS) within 90 days of appointment. Failure to notify these agencies pauses their statute of limitations, potentially allowing them to claw back assets years later.
What happens if an executor rejects a creditor’s claim?
If an executor rejects a creditor’s claim (using Form DE-174), the creditor has exactly 90 days to file a lawsuit in civil court (Probate Code § 9353). Failing to sue within this window legally extinguishes the claim. This is a critical timeframe creditors are acutely aware of.
Are there hidden costs associated with settling an estate, and how can I minimize them?
Absolutely. Beyond legal and probate fees, there’s often interest accruing on debts. Probate Code § 11423 specifies that debts bear interest from the date of death (or the date the claim is allowed) at a rate of 10% per annum (unless the contract specifies otherwise). Even a small delay in payment can significantly inflate the estate’s liabilities. Additionally, assets held in trust may offer certain advantages. The Optional Trust Claims Procedure (Probate Code § 19000) allows trustees to opt-in to a formal claims process, providing a clear cutoff date after 4 months. Without this, creditors could theoretically pursue beneficiaries for up to 1 year after death (CCP § 366.2).
What failures trigger contested proceedings and court intervention in California probate administration?
Success in probate court depends less on the size of the estate and more on the accuracy of the petition and the behavior of the fiduciary. Whether the issue is a forgotten asset, a contested creditor claim, or a disagreement among siblings, understanding the procedural triggers for court intervention is the best defense against prolonged administration.
| Authority Source | Relevance |
|---|---|
| The Court | See the role of the California probate court. |
| Statutes | Review probate governing law. |
| Legal Basis | Check governing legal authorities. |
California probate is most manageable when authority is documented early, assets are classified correctly, and procedure is followed consistently from petition through closing. When the process is approached with realistic expectations about notice, claims, accounting, and dispute risk, the estate is more likely to move toward closure without avoidable conflict or delay.
Verified Authority on Probate Creditor Claims
-
The Creditor Window (4-Month Rule): California Probate Code § 9100
This statute provides the primary protection for the estate. Generally, any creditor who fails to file a formal claim within four months of the executor receiving Letters is barred from collecting. This “clean break” is one of the main advantages of formal probate. -
Mandatory Notice to Public Agencies: California Probate Code § 9202
Regular creditors aren’t the only concern. You MUST send specific notices to the Director of Health Care Services (Medi-Cal), the Franchise Tax Board, and the Victim Compensation Board. Missing this step keeps the liability window open indefinitely for the state. -
Priority of Payments: California Probate Code § 11420 (Debt Hierarchy)
If an estate is “insolvent” (debts exceed assets), you cannot simply pay bills as they arrive. This code establishes the strict pecking order: funeral expenses and administration costs (lawyer/executor fees) get paid before credit cards and medical bills. -
Rejection of Claim (The “Sue or Lose It” Rule): California Probate Code § 9353
When an executor formally rejects a claim (Form DE-174), the clock starts ticking. The creditor has exactly 90 days to file a civil lawsuit to enforce the debt. If they miss this deadline, the claim is barred, regardless of its validity. -
Personal Liability of Executor: California Probate Code § 9601
An executor can be held personally liable for “breach of fiduciary duty” if they pay debts out of order (e.g., paying a credit card before the funeral home) or distribute assets to heirs before clearing all valid creditor claims. -
One-Year Statute of Limitations (Non-Probate): California Code of Civil Procedure § 366.2
This is the ultimate backstop. Even if no probate is opened, creditors generally only have one year from the date of death to file a lawsuit against the decedent’s successors (e.g., trust beneficiaries). After one year, most debts expire automatically.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 278-2800
San Diego Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |